HomeAboutContactOffice LocationLaw FormsSearchForm LLC Now

TestimonialsFree NewslettersTwitterLaw Videos (Coming)Our Store

                                                                             

LLCsCorporationsReal EstateEstate PlanningLandlord LawAZ LawStatutes

Home
Attorneys & Staff
Fixed Fee Services
KEYTLaw Law Blog
Follow on Twitter
What's New
LLC Library
KEYTLaw Store
Arizona Law
AZ Statutes
Corporation Library
Estate Plan Library
IRA Library
Law Forms Library
A La Cart EP Docs
Articles Library
Probate FAQ
Real Estate Law
Landlord Tenant
Copyright Law
Trademark Law
Domain Name Law
Patent Law
Internet Law
IRS Items
Rick Keyt's Articles
Links
Free Newsletters
About Rick Keyt
Contact Information
Office Map
Website Statistics
Flying the F-4
Inspirational Words
Law Office Tech
KEYTLaw Software
For Lawyer Authors

You are here: Home  FTC Actions FTC Action Summaries Internic.com

26.  Internic.com (August 27, 1997)

Australian Defendants: Internic Technology Pty Ltd and Peter Zmijewskix

Type:  Domain Name Registration Scam

Defendants operated a Web site that allegedly misled consumers into thinking they were using the official domain name registration service "InterNIC," at www.internic.net. The bona fide InterNIC was operated by Network Solutions, which had an exclusive contract with the U.S. government to issue Internet domain names. Australia-based Internic Technology Pty Ltd and Peter Zmijewski allegedly operated a copy-cat Internet site at www.internic.com. As many as 13,000 consumers in 9 countries signed up for their domain names with the copy-cat site, paying $250 instead of the $100 normally charged for Internet registrations. The defendants allegedly forwarded $100 to Network Solutions and pocketed the difference.

On August 27, 1997, FTC staff issued an advisory opinion stating that the practices of Internic.com likely violated the FTC Act. The staff referred the case to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, which filed charges in Federal Court in Australia on May 1, 1998, alleging deceptive and misleading conduct. The ACCC charged that consumers who used the copy-cat site were deceived into believing they were using the services provided by InterNIC.

In June 1999, the ACCC and the defendants reached a settlement that set up a compensation trust fund containing $A250,000 (approximately $161,000 U.S.) for consumer redress and barred the Australia-based company from using the internic name.

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/1997/9708/internic.pr3.htm (press release -advisory letter)

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/1998/9805/accc.htm (press release - ACCC complaint)

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/1999/9906/interni1.htm (press release -ACCC settlement)

 

This page was last modified on July 22, 2007.

Subscribe to Richard Keyt's Free Email Newsletters

 

Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Terms of Use | Suggestions  | Credit Card Security

Website Created by & Copyright ©  2001-2009 Richard Keyt, All Rights Reserved