HomeAboutContactOffice LocationLaw FormsSearchForm LLC Now

TestimonialsFree NewslettersTwitterLaw Videos (Coming)Our Store

                                                                             

LLCsCorporationsReal EstateEstate PlanningLandlord LawAZ LawStatutes

Home
Attorneys & Staff
Fixed Fee Services
KEYTLaw Law Blog
Follow on Twitter
What's New
LLC Library
KEYTLaw Store
Arizona Law
AZ Statutes
Corporation Library
Estate Plan Library
IRA Library
Law Forms Library
A La Cart EP Docs
Articles Library
Probate FAQ
Real Estate Law
Landlord Tenant
Copyright Law
Trademark Law
Domain Name Law
Patent Law
Internet Law
IRS Items
Rick Keyt's Articles
Links
Free Newsletters
About Rick Keyt
Contact Information
Office Map
Website Statistics
Flying the F-4
Inspirational Words
Law Office Tech
KEYTLaw Software
For Lawyer Authors

You are here: Home  FTC Actions FTC Action Summaries Epic Resorts

145.  FTC v. Epic Resorts, LLC (M.D. Fla. filed Aug. 14, 2000)

Defendants: Epic Resorts, LLC, Epic Travel, LLC, Thomas Flatley, and Scott Egelkamp

Type:  Telemarketing Sales Rule & FTC Act

The FTC filed suit in federal court on Aug. 14, 2000, charging that Epic sent consumers unsolicited e-mails and faxes and invited them to call defendants’ telemarketers about Florida and Bahamas vacation packages. The FTC alleged that, through these solicitations and outbound telemarketing calls, defendants violated the FTC Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) by misrepresenting that consumers had won or been specially selected to receive a vacation package and by deceiving consumers about the total cost and the material restrictions and conditions related to defendants’ vacation packages. The FTC also alleged that defendants violated the TSR when they called back consumers who said they wanted no more phone calls.

Under the terms of the proposed order announced on September 5, 2001, which will become effective when signed by the district court judge, Epic Resorts, Epic Travel, and Flatley are required to provide redress to consumers who returned their vacation packages within the defendants' 30-day cancellation period and sought, but did not receive, refunds from the company.  The defendants also are enjoined from the illegal activities alleged in the complaint, including:

1.  misrepresenting that consumers have won or have been specially selected to receive a package;

2.  failing to disclose all material conditions associated with a package; or misrepresenting the total cost of the package;

3.  violating the TSR and its "Do Not Call" provision; and

4.  failing to provide credit card refunds within seven business days of receiving a returned package (as required by TILA).

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2000/08/travelunravel.htm (press release - complaint)

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2001/09/epic.htm (press release – stipulated final order)

 

 

This page was last modified on July 22, 2007.

Subscribe to Richard Keyt's Free Email Newsletters

 

Privacy Policy | Disclaimers | Terms of Use | Suggestions  | Credit Card Security

Website Created by & Copyright ©  2001-2009 Richard Keyt, All Rights Reserved